Terrence Regan

Document Type




This Note proposes a new method of Sixth Amendment analysis. This analysis is consistent with the Court’s decision in Padilla v. Kentucky and its other Sixth Amendment precedent. It also responds to concerns that criminal defendants are treated fairly, on the one hand, and that the criminal justice system is not overburdened by an undermined plea system, on the other. This Note argues that the focus of the “competence prong” of the ineffective assistance test must be focused on the attorney’s knowledge and his action in relation to that knowledge. When an attorney knows—or reasonably should know—that a collateral consequence is looming over his client’s conviction, the Supreme Court, this Note, and common sense demand that the attorney advise his client on the matter.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.