Home > Journals > St. John's Law Review > Vol. 88 > No. 3
Document Type
Note
Abstract
(Excerpt)
Part I discusses the development of the Court's ' kids are different" decisions. Part II argues that the rationale behind Graham applies not only to life-without-parole sentences but also to lengthy term-of-years sentences for juvenile non-homicide offenders. Part III suggests a constitutional mandate as to when states must provide a meaningful opportunity for release and explores other legislative action states can employ to comply with Graham.
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons