Document Type
Reply
Publication Title
Minnesota Law Review Headnotes
Publication Date
2010
Volume
95
First Page
19
Abstract
(Excerpt)
In Clawbacks: Prospective Contract Measures in an Era of Excessive Executive Compensation and Ponzi Schemes (the “Article”), we undertook the task of proposing a doctrine of clawbacks that would not only furnish a framework for analyzing the term more systematically, but would also describe the ways the doctrine would relate to established rules of contract law. With his response, In the Shadow of the Omnipresent Claw: In Response to Professors Cherry & Wong (the “Response”), Michael Macchiarola has provided us with an opportunity to articulate these thoughts on the doctrine of clawbacks further, and for that opportunity and his careful reading of the Article, we thank him.
Comments
Available at: https://minnesotalawreview.org/vol-95-winter/