Document Type

Essay

Publication Title

The Second Draft

Publication Date

2008

Volume

22(2)

First Page

6

Abstract

(Excerpt)

As legal writing professors, we exalt analysis over intuition and are trained to follow the facts rather than engage in guess-work. We train our students to do the same. Yet when it comes to the pedagogy of legal analysis, we sometimes disregard our training by relying on observations and anecdotal evidence. Specifically, we may be assuming that the vast majority of our students are visual and/or tactile learners because they have grown up using computers, and we see students using computers all the time. Implicit in our assumption is that learning styles are determined by environmental factors alone or that students’ awareness of their strengths lead them to capitalize on their personal learning-styles. Could we be doing more harm than good by relying on techniques and technology in the classroom that, in reality, may be incompatible with the way most of them learn?

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.