Home > Journals > JCRED > Vol. 9 (1993-1994) > Iss. 1
Volume 9, Fall 1993, Issue 1
Note:
This issue contains articles from Symposium on the Emerging Issues in the Rules of Evidence: Federal and New York.Editorial Board
Symposium
Introductory Remarks
Joseph M. McLaughlin
The Daubert Decision on the Admissability of Scientific Evidence: The Supreme Court Chooses the Right Piece for All the Evidentiary Puzzles
Edward J. Imwinkelried
Some Answers to the Daubert Puzzle
Ronald Simon
Issues Under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(18): The "Learned Treatise" Exception to the Hearsay Rule
Robert F. Magill Jr.
The Politics of Presumption: St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks and the Burdens of Proof in Employment Discrimination Cases
Mark A. Schuman
The Use of After-Acquired Evidence in Employment Discrimination Cases
Robert A. Richardson
Smile. How Prejudicial Can the Candid Camera Be? The Admission of Photographs in a Criminal Trial
James F. Fagan Jr.
Notes
To Tell or Not to Tell? An Analysis of Testimonial Privileges: The Parent-Child and Reporter's Privileges
Yolanda L. Ayala and Thomas C. Martyn
Controversy Over the Exclusionary Rule: Should the Criminal Go Free If the Constable Blunders?
Susan Delaney and Matthew Woitkowski
Confusion Among the Courts: Should the Contents of Personal Papers Be Privileged by the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause?
Anne Marie DeMarco and Elisa Scott
The Admissability of Rehabilitative and Substantive Prior Consistent Statements and the Temporal Requirement
Laurence A. Grayer
Admission of Prior Bad Acts in New York for Impeachment Purposes: A Movement with the Majority
Lenore Mckenna
Compendium: New York Law of Evidence
Joseph M. McLaughlin and St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary