René Reyes

Document Type




The Article is organized as follows. Part I discusses the doctrinal writings of the Catholic Church as they relate to the moral obligations of public actors. As will be seen, these writings lend themselves to an interpretation that suggests a strong role for Catholic moral teaching in all aspects of public life. Part II examines the circumstances in which these writings may be applicable to the decision-making processes of the Supreme Court. Cases involving fundamental rights and liberties are given particular attention in this Section-for these are cases about which Catholic doctrine often has the most to say, and in which the potential for judicial lawmaking is often made most clear. This Section demonstrates that an activist theory of constitutional interpretation can find ample support in Catholic teaching. Part III considers the implications of the activist Catholic theory for judicial nominations, with the goal of emphasizing the potential relevance of religious doctrine in the confirmation process. The Article concludes with some observations about the potential limits of Catholic self-identification as a predictor of judicial behavior and the need for further empirical research to measure the actual impact of Catholic teaching on the judiciary.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.