Document Type




Part I discusses the evolution of personal jurisdiction jurisprudence and the difficulties that modern varieties of intangible property pose to established analyses. Specifically, while most jurisdictions have acknowledged the difficulties inherent in assigning a "location" to intangible property, few have attempted to update existing precedent to accommodate modern scenarios.

Part II examines the recent Arizona decision in State v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc., where the Supreme Court of Arizona confronted the "location" of electronic debts as an issue of first impression.

Part III argues for the Harris fiction's relevance in the modern era. The complexities of modern society demand the resuscitation of the doctrine to adequately cope with an emerging brand of intangible property. This Part posits that Harris applies more than ever, as innovative forms of property are becoming accessible any and everywhere; the holding of Harris is, then, no longer a fiction at all. This section also advances a two-pronged inquiry for assessing a state's legal basis to exercise jurisdiction over such property: (1) whether the property at issue is simultaneously accessible in multiple locations simultaneously; and (2) whether the property exhibits a meaningful connection with the forum state.


To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.