Home > Journals > St. John's Law Review > Vol. 91 > No. 3
Document Type
Article
Abstract
(Excerpt)
We thus have, at this point, a preliminary sense of the importance of some possible choices in deciding whose voices and participation should be taken seriously, as that of our epistemic peers, in deciding legal questions. This Article addresses these preliminary understandings in several legal contexts. We can do so most profitably on the basis of a better, fuller, and more specific understanding of the crucial idea of epistemic peerhood. It is thus the idea of epistemic peerhood itself that this Article addresses immediately below.
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Courts Commons, Legal Profession Commons