Home > Journals > St. John's Law Review > Vol. 87 > No. 2
Volume 87, Spring-Summer 2013, Numbers 2-3
Note:
This issue contains articles from Symposium: Revolution in the Regulation of Financial Advice: The U.S., the U.K. and Australia. Panels include: "The Future of Fiduciary Duties for Financial Advice;" "The Structure of Regulation for Investment Advisers: A Self-Regulatory Organization or Not?;" and "International Issues in the Regulation of Financial Advice."Editorial Board
Symposium
The Future of Financial Advice: Eliminating the False Distinction Between Brokers and Investment Advisers
Christine Lazaro
Introduction to Symposium: Revolution in the Regulation of Financial Advice: The U.S., the U.K. and Australia
Francis J. Facciolo
The Time for a Uniform Fiduciary Duty Is Now
Ryan K. Bakhtiari, Katrina Boice, and Jeffrey S. Majors
What's in a Name: The Battle over a Uniform Fiduciary Standard for Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers
Andrew Melnick
Can the Retail Investor Survive the Fiduciary Standard?
Paul R. Walsh and David W. Johns
Rethinking U.S. Investment Adviser Regulation
Anita K. Krug
H.R. 4624: The Pitfalls of a Self-Regulatory Organization for Investment Advisers and Why User Fees Would Better Accomplish the Goal of Investment Adviser Accountability
David G. Tittsworth
Financial Advice in Australia: Principles to Proscription; Managing to Banning
Richard Batten and Gail Pearson
Notes
A Better Public Performance Analysis for Digital Music Locker Storage
Michael Walker Jr.
The Proper Borders of Padilla: Courts Must Avoid Over-Expansion of Sixth Amendment Claims
Terrence Regan
The Battle over Combat: A Practical Application of the Combatant Activities Exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act
Michael Kutner